I wish to thank all donors who cared enough to offer any amount to the up keeping of this informative board and the main website. For those of you wanting to donate please use this PayPal (hbsking@gmail.com) address to send your donations.Or click on the donation button on the main HBS web page at this link: http://www.homebuiltstabilizers.com/
36084 Posts in
3751 Topics by 4305
Members
- Latest Member: pepe pompin
I have a glidecam V-8, which is very similar to the newer smooth shooter and I use it with my 5D Mark II. I have been using the sled hand held and on the arm/vest... usually hand held you want it pretty light so you don't fatigue as quick, right? When it's on the arm+vest rig the manual suggests have it total out at 9lbs for optimal stabilization right? So, if I kept it really light for hand held (assuming it's balanced properly) why couldn't I just add some weights to the end of the arm instead of the sled?
Any thoughts or corrections on what I posted would be great!
I have a glidecam V-8, which is very similar to the newer smooth shooter and I use it with my 5D Mark II. I have been using the sled hand held and on the arm/vest... usually hand held you want it pretty light so you don't fatigue as quick, right? When it's on the arm+vest rig the manual suggests have it total out at 9lbs for optimal stabilization right? So, if I kept it really light for hand held (assuming it's balanced properly) why couldn't I just add some weights to the end of the arm instead of the sled?
Any thoughts or corrections on what I posted would be great!
Hi Cody! Interesting question thou! I think one can gain better inertia for smoother panorama by adding weights distanced from sleds pan axis. The heavier object itself - the better stability.
The sled is the point of balance to the system and not the arm. You are not balancing the arm but the the sled as a whole. By balancing the arm does not make the sled behave like it should. If that was the case then Garrett would have done so.
Author
Logged
