logo
gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
gfx gfx
gfxgfx
 
I wish to thank all donors who cared enough to offer any amount to the up keeping of this informative board and the main website. For those of you wanting to donate please use this PayPal (hbsking@gmail.com) address to send your donations.
 
gfx gfx
gfx
38354 Posts in 3963 Topics by 4684 Members - Latest Member: Dan McKay July 30, 2010, 12:18:28 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchHBS WEBSITELoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Send this topic Print
Author Topic: Categorizing levels of Stabilizer brands - Part 1  (Read 4079 times)
Charles King
Executive Producer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7386



WWW
Re: Categorizing levels of Stabilizer brands - Version 1
« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2006, 08:19:51 AM »

Thank you for verifying this Job. Smiley It's good to have a long time operator to justify my assessments. Smiley Hope you are well.
Logged

Charles King
--------------------------
Tom Lindsay
Gaffer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


Re: Categorizing levels of Stabilizer brands - Version 1
« Reply #16 on: November 22, 2006, 05:46:42 PM »

I appreciate all the info you pros have posted out here.  I was wondering if any of you (pros or newbies) would like to comment on the FS-Pro 1 or Varizoom's Prolite.  I know several of you don't have a high view of the flowpod, but didn't know if anyone had tried out the dual-articulating arms of the prolite.  I am flying the XLH1 and XL2 at weddings, so not a lot of running, etc.  Just looking for something to provide some gliding action.  My budget is $4K or less, but would really like a dual arm rig.

Thanks!

-Tom Lindsay
Logged
Leigh Wanstead
Assistant Director
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 231


WWW
Re: Categorizing levels of Stabilizer brands - Version 1
« Reply #17 on: November 22, 2006, 06:34:56 PM »

Hi Tom,

The taste of budding is in the eating. Just download their demo video and watch the smoothness of the shooting by your own eyes.

Regards
Leigh

I appreciate all the info you pros have posted out here.  I was wondering if any of you (pros or newbies) would like to comment on the FS-Pro 1 or Varizoom's Prolite.  I know several of you don't have a high view of the flowpod, but didn't know if anyone had tried out the dual-articulating arms of the prolite.  I am flying the XLH1 and XL2 at weddings, so not a lot of running, etc.  Just looking for something to provide some gliding action.  My budget is $4K or less, but would really like a dual arm rig.

Thanks!

-Tom Lindsay
Logged

Stabilizer manufacturer
SmoothArm operator

Demo video on my site
http://www.salenz.com/nfblog/?page_id=7

Demo video on google video site
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=www.salenz.com
Charles King
Executive Producer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7386



WWW
Re: Categorizing levels of Stabilizer brands - Version 1
« Reply #18 on: November 23, 2006, 01:05:52 AM »

I say do the test yourself. I personally haven't tested this model but if the chance came about I would. But the surest thing is if you have the chance is to make your own assessments. But as you mentioned Tom that you only looking at doing slow moving shots; then I think a simple handheld would do. Then again, if you tend on doing it for longer scenes then an arm and vest system would work better. I think for what you want to achieve the system will do the job. I think almost any low end rig might just carry out the job without any major problems using the weight you requested.
The rest would be just practicing. Smiley I have to take a another look at the model you are referring to because I have forgotten what it looks like.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2006, 08:43:03 AM by Charles King » Logged

Charles King
--------------------------
Billy Taylor
Assistant Director
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 204



Re: Categorizing levels of Stabilizer brands - Part 1
« Reply #19 on: June 22, 2010, 12:19:01 AM »

it is understandable that each user/operator will have his / her preferences with rigs but i think the common theme Charles has been conveying is that proper form and technique can salvage a lesser system to an extent but the BEST system cannot improve an operator in wrong form...back to my EFP video...iti has been on pause while i peruse the various threads...
Logged

Nande yanen ka?!?
gfx
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Send this topic Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
The HBS Group | Powered by SMF 1.0.3.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.

Fusedog Media Group
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!