logo
gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
gfx gfx
gfx
31166 Posts in 3339 Topics by 3166 Members - Latest Member: Christoph Jehle November 20, 2008, 04:41:40 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchHBS WEBSITELoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Send this topic Print
Author Topic: Vest plans - old versus new question  (Read 997 times)
David Delaney
Key Grip
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 118


View Profile
Vest plans - old versus new question
« on: August 30, 2005, 11:35:34 AM »

Much thanks for the design for a back and front mounted vest in the book Cody.
A question though - after reading the book and seeing the new design on this website, have you found that the back mounted bar that swings around help alliviate the strain on your hips/back?  In the old design, it attaching bar ran parallel to the back, but in the new design on this site, you have it run parallel and then turn 90 degrees so it is now perpendicular to your back.  Has this made a major difference in stability and comfort?
Logged
Cody Deegan
Producer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1002



View Profile WWW
Re: Vest plans - old versus new question
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2005, 05:19:56 AM »

I haven't fully tested it yet because I am waiting on some parts to finish my sled.  The main reason for doing the wrap-around bar was so that it would be easier for me to mount up the arm to the vest.  Before it was a bit awkward reaching back and hooking it up.  The one weight test I did do with the new vest felt no different from my old vest.  The weight is still transferred to the same spot in the back, except now there's a bit more leverage acting on it.  So perhaps I might feel a bit more pressure in the belt area.  We'll see.
Logged
gfx
Pages: [1] Go Up Send this topic Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
The HBS Group | Powered by SMF 1.0.3.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.

Fusedog Media Group
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!