logo
gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
gfx gfx
gfx
31166 Posts in 3339 Topics by 3166 Members - Latest Member: Christoph Jehle November 20, 2008, 03:58:06 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchHBS WEBSITELoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Send this topic Print
Author Topic: Cody's Crane  (Read 4885 times)
sacherjj
Gaffer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


View Profile
Re: Cody's Crane
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2003, 07:08:00 PM »

I used to see some information about this on various robot sites, but I don't have any links handy.  I would search around some of the robotics sites.  Although, most of them will use small processors, like the BasicSTAMP, because that is the easiest way to drive the servos.

Logged
SirElliott
Director
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 348



View Profile
Building a motorized pan/tilt head step 1
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2003, 02:54:00 PM »

See "Building a motorized pan/tilt head step 1" in the Cranes section.

Logged
AMelling
Key Grip
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 45


View Profile
Re: Building a motorized pan/tilt head step 1
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2005, 12:37:00 AM »

The 555 is not good for our application because it causes large voltage spikes and is notorious for having bad noise.   This causes the servo to jitter.  The + and - voltage spikes could also damage the circuitry inside the servo.

The 555, when used as an astable multivibrator, creates a chain of pulses, just like a regular oscillator.  This pulse train is sent to another 555 acting as a monostable multivibrator, which allows you to vary the length of the individual pulses.  This effectively modulates the duty cycle. Since this requires 2 555s, it is normally done on a 556.  A 558 has 4 multivibrators.

The 555 is also the most produced integrated circuit in history.  This is because it has such a range of uses in simple projects, but for our use it is simply too inaccurate and pervious to noise.

Although learning to use and program a microcontroller does have a steep learning curve, I think it is worth the work.  Discrete digital components are more accurate and controllable than analog equivalents. While the initial investment of time and money is higher, microcontrollers will save you both in the long run.  This is why they have sold $12 billion last year alone.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2005, 02:41:02 AM by Kevin Clark » Logged
AMelling
Key Grip
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 45


View Profile
Re: Building a motorized pan/tilt head step 1
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2005, 12:47:00 AM »

I forgot to mention that the 555 is notorious for changing characteristics with heat and voltage changes.  This means that you will have to continually recenter the center frequency, unless you implement some feedback system that automatically calibrates the monostable frequency...  or you could write 35 lines of code.  I've done both, and the latter is way easier.

Edited by: AMelling at: 3/5/05 0:49
Logged
Cody Deegan
Producer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1002



View Profile WWW
Re: Building a motorized pan/tilt head step 1
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2005, 07:06:00 AM »

Okay, you people are causing my head to spin.  My jib just uses simple r/c servos.  The information you all are discussing would be very beneficial to advanced builders, but they'll never find it because it's in a forum about my jib.  Keep up the great discussion in the regular Cranes forum.







Cody

Logged
gfx
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Send this topic Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
The HBS Group | Powered by SMF 1.0.3.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.

Fusedog Media Group
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!